Taking patients’ embodied knowledge seriously in maternity care. Epistemological and ethical issues

Published: June 5, 2025
Abstract Views: 85
PDF: 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The epistemic dimension of the clinical encounter is crucial, and the maternal context is no exception: whether or not the knowledge provided by patients during labor and birth is valued can have a crucial impact on the clinical relationship. To explore this aspect, I will first attempt to show the potentially negative epistemic and ethical implications of ignoring the embodied knowledge provided by patients, both for patients themselves and for health care professionals, by highlighting the specificity of the maternal health care context. I will then suggest that because of the relevance of these harms, it is crucial to understand the source of this behavior, and that vice epistemology may be a useful conceptual framework for doing so. In particular, I will argue that a sui generis form of epistemic arrogance may be a valid candidate for uncovering, and hopefully addressing, one of the causes of this phenomenon. I will conclude that one of the primary causes of the disregard for patients’ relevant embodied knowledge lies at the institutional level and its focus on efficiency as profit maximization. Thus, the goal should be to advocate for a change in the overall ethos and epistemic policies of health care institutions.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Stefanello, E. (2025). Taking patients’ embodied knowledge seriously in maternity care. Epistemological and ethical issues. Medicina E Morale, 74(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2025.1642