https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2025.1647
The relationship between quality and sanctity of life in medical futility decisions for terminally ill children in England and Wales
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Medical progress offers opportunities to save and prolong lives, but with these come ever more excruciating decisions on when to withdraw or withhold invasive medical treatments for terminally ill young children. Parents and clinicians normally need to agree on the child’s medical plan; however, if intractable disagreements among the parties occur, the final decision is remitted to the Family Court in the UK as in most countries around the world. The aim of this paper is to analyse the factors that define medical treatments as futile and the role played by the principles (variously understood) of quality-of-life and sanctity-of-life in the decision-making process both at the juridical and medical level. The paper will analyse court decisions and the academic literature in an attempt to shed more light on these pressing and multifaceted issues. It will then be argued that the interdependence of these factors is essential for making informed and unbiased decisions about the suspension or otherwise of life-sustaining treatments in terminally ill children.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.