Assessing the perceived ethics of an AI-driven platform that delivers art-based contents to radiation oncology patients. The Art4ART experience
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The “Art4ART” platform integrates Artificial Intelligence into oncology care by providing artistic stimuli to patients undergoing radiation therapy. This study preliminarily assesses the perceived ethical implications of the platform, examining healthcare professionals’ perceptions, by creating a 69-item questionnaire designed to evaluate the ethical principles of Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, Autonomy, Justice, and Explicability (in accordance with international guidelines). Thirty-four healthcare professionals working in an Italian research hospital (Dept. of Radiation Oncology) evaluated the Art4ART platform. Findings suggest the platform meets ethical standards by promoting wellbeing, supporting patient autonomy, and providing equitable access to care. Yet, certain areas, like data transparency and system monitoring, require further attention. Healthcare professionals also noted the need for enhanced training and clear communication on the system’s limitations and malfunction reporting. Overall, the platform’s focus on patient- centered care and the conveyance of positive values is well-received, underscoring the importance of ethical oversight in AI applications. This analysis highlights that the platform’s value lies not only in its technological features but also in fostering human-centered, compassionate care that respects oncology patient freedom and dignity within their therapeutic journey.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.