0
0
0
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Beauchamp and Childress' principlism: theoretical reasons of some persistent conceptual issues

Authors

Beauchamp and Childress' principlism is probably the most influential model for justifying bioethical judgements at the international level. Despite its widespread adoption and influence, it is frequently subject to misunderstanding and oversimplification. Given its enduring relevance, the prevalence of a superficial grasp of its current structure, and the likelihood that the latest edition will be the final one, this paper seeks to achieve the following two objectives: a) clarify the current theoretical framework of principlism, demonstrating its ability to address most criticisms effectively; b) spotlight unresolved theoretical flaws and delve into their philosophical underpinnings. I will then conclude by suggesting a research direction for overcoming these persistent issues.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
    • Readers: 13
see details

Downloads

Citations

Crossref
0
Scopus
0

How to Cite

Furlan, E. (2024). Beauchamp and Childress’ principlism: theoretical reasons of some persistent conceptual issues. Medicina E Morale, 73(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2024.1254